Editorial + Font Resize -

UNFAIR STAY ON BAN ORDER
P A Francis | Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 08:00 Hrs  [IST]

It is after several years of debate, the Drug Controller General of India decided to ban the manufacture and sale of 4 controversial drugs namely nimesulide suspension, cisapride, PPA and human placenta extracts in the country in February last. The notification to this effect was issued on February 10 after Drug Technical Advisory Board recommended their withdrawal from the market. The DTAB has been examining the safety profiles of  the drugs for some years and advised their recall  from the market as their adverse effects outweigh the benefits. These drugs have been already banned by many developed countries over ten years ago. In India, the dangerous side effects of nimesulide was brought to the notice of the DCGI first time by the Ahmedabad based Consumer Education and Research Centre in April 2000. DCGI had then ordered an investigation to assess the safety profile of the drug in the Indian context and nothing further happened and the drug remained in the market since then. Obviously there has been pressure on the office of DCGI to not to issue the ban order as some of the drug companies stand to lose several crores of rupees of business. However due to persistent pressure from independent medical experts and consumer groups, DCGI came out with the notification.

The decision for withdrawal of four drugs by the DCGI was well received by the pharma industry associations and there has been no serious objections to the order as it is in larger public interest. Subsequently, the state drug controllers have started taking the follow up actions to enforce the order. In fact, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat drug control departments have already issued stop sale orders of these four drugs in their states within a few days of the DCGI’s directive. The only demand from some of the associations representing small scale units was to postpone the ban of sale these products till the expiry of stocks in the trade channels. That is a reasonable request and state drug controllers have already agreed to consider this demand. What is disturbing the DCGI and medical  experts now is the stay granted by the Madras High Court against the government ban order last week on a petition filed by a leading pharmaceutical company. The Court should have duly considered the entire background behind such a government order before stalling it. Any continuation of marketing drugs with major ADRs could be highly dangerous to the millions of patients who are taking them. And when the country’s most authoritative body recommends a ban on the basis of technical findings, no pharmaceutical company has the moral authority to move court against such a step. Now having issued the order and state governments started acting on it, the DCGI has to uphold the order in the public interest. DCGI’s decision to move the Supreme Court for vacating the stay is thus just humanitarian and fully justified.

Comments

Dhiman Chakraborty Apr 7, 2011 3:29 PM
Research findings on indigenous human placental extract which is available at pubmed(www.pubmed.com)is very rational, based on extremely scientific foundation. Efficacy of the drug is unquestionable and it has been accepted by the global scientific community through several high rated international and National scientific journals. Banning of such a successful Indian formulation is a shame for the country itself. Through the research on this placental extract our country has been glorified several times. Without knowing the actual fact, banning the drug is shameful.

Dr P D Chakraborty Apr 6, 2011 2:53 PM
This is to draw your kind attention that the research on human placental aqueous extract for its evaluation as a drug for wound healing had already been established globally. The extensive 12 yrs research work at Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata (a unit of CSIR, India) produced many a number of scientific publications which glorified India at global scientific community. It is a very effective and safe drug. It contains several bioactive therapeutic molecules. We (the team of Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, a unit of CSIR India) are working for the last 12 years with the extract the trade name is ‘Placentrex’ and identified different molecules with the potent therapeutic efficacy e.g. fibronectin type III peptide, NADPH, PDRNs,small peptides with protease regulatory property etc (ref. www. Pubmed.com). We have been invited several times abroad (Europe, especially in France) to deliver lectures on Placentrex research findings. So far we have not found any adverse effe
Swapan Das Apr 6, 2011 11:57 AM
What I have personally noted is that there's lack of general awareness regarding human placental extract. Just for the sake - that’s Western countries not using it, so we should also "discard" one of our own products is not done. Today there's country restrictions apply for HPE products but one should analyze under what circumstances they have been enforced while its currently being used in Oriental countries like Japan and South Korea with their Govt. approvals and what could be the consequences of it (esp. in India) if such restrictions are withdrawn in western countries.

The readers can check the following sites, the commercial HPE products from Japan claims of having the approval of the Japanese Govt.

http://www.placenta-jbp.co.jp/en/laugh/index.html
(or http://www.placenta-jbp.co.jp/en/top_menu.html)
http://www.melsmon.com/product_eng.html

And in In India the extensive research on human placental extract is done by Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (IICB), Kolkata, a

Post Your Comment

 

Enquiry Form