MSF expresses concern over Gilead’s deal with generic companies for hepatitis C drugs
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) expressed concern over the recently finalised Gilead Sciences agreements with a seven Indian pharma manufacturers to produce and sell generic versions of two new hepatitis C drugs – sofosbuvir and ledipasvir.
They argued that although Gilead agreements will allow some generic companies to market generic versions of both drugs in 91 countries regardless of the patent status in those countries, most of the countries expected to be included in the license agreements are low-income economies, many of which may not have had patent protection on these new drugs in the first place.
The association stressed that Gilead’s deal excludes many middle-income countries considered by industry to be profitable emerging markets, even though people living with chronic hepatitis C in these countries often come from poor and marginalised communities with little ability to pay for expensive medicines. Gilead’s licensing terms fall far short of ensuring widespread affordable access to these new drugs in middle-income countries, where over 70 per cent of people with hepatitis C live today
Increasing generic competition is an important strategy in reducing prices and increasing sustainable affordable access when companies file for patent protection for essential medicines. Hepatitis C is especially prevalent in middle-income countries – with approximately 73 per cent of the burden in these countries – but disappointingly many of these countries remain excluded from accessing both Gilead’s lowest price and the generic versions licensed by these agreements.
MSF pointed out that it remains to be seen whether in reality the terms and conditions offered by Gilead will enable widespread access to an optimised and affordable regimen needed for millions of people in low and middle income countries, including patients seeking treatment from MSF. MSF is preparing to initiate treatment in a few medical projects using new direct acting antivirals for people living with chronic HCV.
“We welcome the interest of generic companies to scale up production of new direct-acting antivirals and Gilead’s decision to make the final agreement public; however, a highly restrictive voluntary license that blocks millions of people with hepatitis C from affordable prices is not acceptable. MSF hopes that excluded governments will take all relevant measures available under global trade rules and national patent laws to secure low-cost generic versions of these medicines,” said Rohit Malpani, director of policy and analysis, Médecins Sans Frontières, Access Campaign.
Approximately 180 million people live with hepatitis C today, with 350,000 people dying annually of the disease. New oral drugs like sofosbuvir and ledipasvir, known as direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), hold significant promise to improve treatment outcomes for hepatitis C patients around the world, with studies showing high cure rates. US and EU regulators have approved two new DAAs within the last 10 months, and others are in development.
However, the high prices set by Gilead for sofosbuvir, for example, are an important barrier to scaling up access to diagnostics and treatment.