TopNews + Font Resize -

AIOCD wants govt to amend Rule 65 of D&C Act to allow substitution of drugs by chemists
Suja Nair Shirodkar, Mumbai | Monday, August 6, 2012, 08:00 Hrs  [IST]

All India Organisation of Chemists and Druggists (AIOCD) made a representation to the Group of Ministers (GoMs) in Delhi requesting them to put pressure on the government to allow chemists and druggists in the country to issue cheaper substitute drugs to the patients from the one that is prescribed by the doctors. This demand is made to ensure easy accessibility of affordable medicines to the patients in the wake of the current practice of prescribing expensive branded drugs to the patients when cheaper substitutes are available.

In the representation, AIOCD demanded the government to amend the rule 65 of the Drugs and Cosmetics (D&C) Act and make provisions in the law to empower the chemists and druggiest to dispense cheaper alternative medicines to the patients. Today, Rule 65 of the D&C Act restricts all the chemists and druggists from dispensing a substitute brand to the patients when there are enough alternate brands available in the market that are far more cheaper and affordable than the brands prescribed.

J S Shinde, the national president of the country’s largest pharma trade body, AIOCD, stressed, “Our point of contention is why should not a pharmacists be given the right to suggest and give an alternative medication to the patients for their welfare especially when they have the knowledge and the expertise in the field. Most importantly, this is a patient centric demand made with an intention to give relief to all the patients across the nation by offering them an option to choose between the available brands based on their monetary capacity.”

He further informed that to strengthen this cause and to put pressure on the Central government on this issue, they are going to again raise this topic with the state government as well.  For this,the state body, Maharashtra State Chemists and Druggists Association (MSCDA) is soon planning to meet the State FDA and the state government officials on August 8. MSCDA will be including this demand as one of the key agenda during the meeting along with other long list of demands that needs urgent consideration.

Other important point that will be discussed during the meeting is on the ongoing issue of doctors dispensing medicines under Schedule K (5) of the D&C Act. MSCDA has been pressing the government to formulate guidelines to ensure stronger policing of the drug distribution system in the state to restrict doctors from indulging in unethical practice of selling medicines to the patients directly. This demand comes in the wake of increased incidents of doctors selling drugs to the patients by misinterpreting the provisions under Schedule K (5) Act.

Comments

Anand maheshwari Oct 13, 2012 1:56 PM
res.sir
it is very good descison reg.all reitailor in INDIA.
AND I show another point.reg.reitail business.today we found in gov.hosp.there.doc.write pres. but not name and reg. no.still they write pres.that time fda.off.make case aginest retail chemist so.ple.notice this point

your faithfully reitailor
Anand maheshwari
(maheshwari medical)
pune
9730041663


Debabrata Das Sep 25, 2012 2:18 PM
Last week my son gone to a medical shop for Cyfolac DT but shop dispense Cefolac DT 100mg. The incident happen in a Bangalore based reputed medicine shop. Ultimately patient took one dose in my absence. Is is dispense by a pharmacist, obviously NO.
Varinder Galhotra Aug 27, 2012 2:32 AM
I strongly support and agree that a pharmacist has sufficient knowledge about pharmaceuticals. Substitution with same salt or composition should be allowed. It will give too much relief to patients.There are so many rules and laws for manufacturing pharmaceuticals.Substitutes retain same therapeutic value.Patients are being exploited by doctors and pharma companies on the name of branded generic medicines.
GautamBhattacharya Aug 18, 2012 8:57 PM
AIOCD is professionally managed unit of Chemist & Druggist hence will be always favourable towards them.This amendment could be somewhere harmful to the patient and somewhere fruitful.One retailor almost do one's business as profit centre first and that is also justified as an businessman,and as he gets this benefit,will start to sustitute brands @ his benifit .
Pramod Sharma Aug 13, 2012 2:34 PM
...if so; " AASMAAN SE GIRE & KHAJOOR PER ATKE "
A totally impractical demand, because RETAILERS & STOCKISTS are already forcibly, getting indirect CRM services, ie; squeezing the sales people including top managements. They are in the virtually DICTATING / BLACK MAILING terms in certain states.
On to the top of the thing, if; they are to decide what to sell, where is the need and role of Doctor's Rx or even Marketing companies.
If they are really & seriously concerned about benefit of the patient, would they accept lesser margins than what they are forcing companies to favor, may be through adjustments? ????
Bhagyesh Dwivedi Aug 8, 2012 6:43 AM
Dear Forum

Have we ever seen a non Medico wife / younger brother / son / helper of Doctor diagnosing the patient and writing prescription? Answer will be No (barring for very rare rural exception).

Now, let us rephrase the situation -

Have we ever seen a B Pharma (which is requirement to open a chemist shop in many states) selling drugs in a chemist shop ? Again answer will be NO, because even in cities like Mumbai, person on whom lic is taken is mostly a dummy person and chemist shop is operated by either semi qualified owner / his wife / son / brother / sister / assistant ........ Almost all of them are non pharma graduate.

Now, is AIOCD not aware of this fact or want to ignore this fact? Out of above mentioned owner / his wife / son / brother / sister / assistant ......., whom do they consider qualified to decide judiously over substituting a drug. AIOCD should understand that it is not cheap medicine only which is important, rather, it is effective medication which i

Post Your Comment

 

Enquiry Form