IPAB adjourns hearing on post-grant opposition to Roche's Pegasys to Sept 21
The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in Chennai has once again adjourned the hearing in the post grant opposition case against the patent granted to Roche for Pegasys to September 21.
According to sources, the IPAB heard the multinational drug company Roche's arguments in the case on September 6 and adjourned the case to September 21 as the arguments by the company were incomplete. The post grant opposition against the patent granted to Roche for Pegasys (Peg intergferon alpha 2B), a key drug used for hepatitis-C treatment, was filed by Sankalp Rehab Trust, a patient group challenging the validity of the Pegasus patent.
Sources said the case is being heard by the two-member IPAB bench, Justice Prabha Sridevan and DPS Parmar, Technical Member (Patents). While Anand Grover is appearing for Sankalp Rehab Trust, Rahul Balaji is the counsel for patent firm, De Penning and De Penning, which is representing Roche in this matter.
Earlier, the crucial hearing on the case was held by the IPAB on two days on July 30 and 31 this year. As the argument in the case was not complete, the hearing was adjourned for September 6. The case is crucial for the civil society as the treatment for hepatitis-C is currently very expensive and out of reach of people due to the patent on this drug.
The outcome in the case is keenly watched by the civil society as well as others as the case is significant because in spite of recent advances in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection, many people in Asia struggle to access it, due to the limited availability of generic pegylated interferon – a key component of effective treatment regimens.
According to civil society groups working in the health sector, the re-hearing of the patent challenge is an opportunity to create access to a medicine that is critical for the survival of HIV-hepatitis C co-infected people. Resource-limited Asian countries cannot procure patented pegylated interferon at the current pricing, which drastically hampers their ability to respond to hepatitis C infection on a national level.